Meaning, I suppose, that some decisions can’t be measured by the conventional terms of ‘wrong’ and ‘right’, because such decisions don’t abide in the realm of morality that those terms inhabit, or were made to elucidate. They will always be attached instead to a kind of arbitrariness of spirit, or vague personal instinct, which wins out over some opposing, but equally vague, instinct or spirit, though both sides of the dilemma, such as it is, might present themselves through all manner of apparently ‘good’ reasons, or rationale.